Groove Space Spam is almost an oxymoron.

Almost.

There are three principles of Groove that I feel make the oxymoron case.

Groove has, as key to its design, spaces that people are *invited* in to. Depending on the level of authorisation required this may be specific person to person invites, or just a "open invitation" file. In other words, there is some degree of control as to whom may enter and hence whom may post messages.

Next, each user has a strong key that provides their identity. It is possible to change identities and to create "false" accounts, but in general I use Groove for a specific purpose with my specific account so it is "inconvenient" for me to use multiple accounts.

Finally, unlike anonymous email or blog spam, Groove has the ability to *uninvite* nasty people from spaces. This is a big stick that can't be applied to other forms of spam.

However, the "almost" part of the oxymoron statement is that Groove does not allow me to block an user from instant messaging me. Once they have my account in their contact list a spammer can really go to town spamming me. I am sure though, that Groove Networks would jump in at some point and disable this type of user.

Anyway, I hope this is considered spam in any way.

Google Maps - Not only a Website nor only a Service - It's also Developer Platform.

I'm in the US doing a consulting assignment at the moment. As previously mentioned Adelaide, South Australia is home. So I'm a long way from home and this is only the second time I've been to the States. The last was in 1997.

So image how important Google Maps is for me. I can whack in my hotel's address and then that of my client site and bam! I can find the way there with ease.

But I haven't limited my use of Google's maps to just using the service. I've been reading Blogs about it. I found some interesting links all over the place regarding how it works. Here's a good one: http://jgwebber.blogspot.com/2005/02/mapping-google.html

But “mini-app“ that I thought was very neat is a little tour of Keene (a small town in MA, USA). The final comment made in the screencast about GPS being the tool to “annotate the planet“ is really quite funky.

Bring on the future - oh, and Google Maps for Australia please!

I'm currently a long way from home. I'm in the United States of America. Right now I'm on a flight from Dallas-Fort Worth heading to Denver and then on to San Francisco before arriving in Sacramento to do some business there for the next couple of weeks.

Home is Adelaide, South Australia.

The US is an interesting place for me. Being an Aussie it's a lot like home, but with some differences. Let me give some examples.

English is the lingua prima - although we tend to spell words the international way and not the US way. "Colour" instead of "color" (which in some ways is annoying because my spell checker - even though it  is set to "English (Australia)" in Windows many programs just only seem to work in "English (US)". But I can get over it.

The cars (or automobiles) we drive are similar, although we drive on the left-hand side of the road. US cars are larger - much larger - and get filled by the gallon and we fill by the litre (which, of course, must be spelt "liter" in the US as my spell checker just bitched about my normal spelling).

The when the weather forecast in the US says it's 32 degrees it's cold. When it's 32 degrees in Australia it's hot. It seems that in both places we forget the add the "F" and "C".

But one area where things are more than a little different is the growing ubiquity of wireless internet access. Australia has hotspots, but most are not free. My home town has "Citilan" which has free access, but you must be a client of one of around half-a-dozen or so internet service providers to get these invisible bits of data.

In the US it seems that free access is free. I just spent half-an-hour waiting in Dallas-Fort Worth airport where T-Mobile provides free access Wi-fi (although it didn't work - I got an IP address but received no data).

I'm lead to believe that Starbucks, McDonald's and numerous other companies are providing free access just to get people in the door. Even entire cities, like San Francisco, provide Wi-fi clouds for free roaming access.

So here's the question of ethics: when I turn on my laptop and Skype automatically connects should I expect this wireless benefactor to be free or do I need to perform due diligence to determine the difference between a public service and a poorly or unsecured private network?

I ask this question because for the last three days I've been connecting to a wireless network called "linksys" in Lewisville, TX. Who is providing that link?

So where's the line drawn on free access and theft?

If began littering the local neighbourhood (aka neighborhood) with a handful of cash should I cry foul if people take my money? Is it my money or I have I made it public domain? Is there implicit permission given when one doesn't secure their Wi-fi?

Are "they" breaking the terms of their ISP contract by allowing others to share the connection? Does that change anything?

Over time will the ethics change? I mean three years ago Wi-fi hardware defaulted to open and you had to explicitly secure it. Now the default is closed and you must explicitly open it. So does that mean that when there is an open access connection that the owner has explicitly opened it or are they just using old technology?

Ah well, I got to get my email and to make some Skype calls thanks to "linksys" in Lewisville, TX. Thank you, whomever you may be.